This week I picked up a business and careers newspaper for
students and the topic Big Pharma on the cover caught my eye. I’m not sure what
I expected seeing that the article would hardly reflect my mindset. Yet when I
read it it was all about the issues the industry faces and how they can recover
to protect their profits. The article was also quite blatant about the fact
that the pharmaceutical industry is one of the biggest industries in the world.
I’m not sure why I was surprised at the approach but I thought it was pretty
shameless in the way in which the profit driven aspect was depicted as
something positive and desirable. I couldn’t help feeling a bit indignant
though, let me explain why.
I have long since learned to shut up about my beliefs about
healing. I have had too many conversations which go more or less like this:
“Why do you work in marketing if you studied psychology?”
“I wanted to be a psychologist but after having studied it I
don’t really believe that the traditional approach to psychology is helpful.
Which led me to turn to alternative forms of healing.”
“Oh, what does that entail?”
“Well…” (I usually just get vague at this point in order to
avoid any reference to shamanic techniques or energy healing. I’ll continue as
if I did in fact express my healing interests.)
“That’s nice. I have heard of such and such a person who was
exploited very much by someone parading as a psychic or a spiritualist. They
were never quite the same after that.”
Or: “This person got into trouble because he was actually a
physiotherapist but then he tried to do ‘energy healing’ on his patient, which
didn’t work. One has to be very careful of these unscientific things.”
So I shut up for fear of being ridiculed or labelled as a
hippie or unscientific. I know it’s a bit lame but after reading the Big Pharma
article I think maybe I could be more shameless about my “beliefs” and appeal
to people’s common sense a bit more.
Let’s start with science, which is supposed to be about
knowledge and rationality. Somehow I’m not convinced. In the mind of the
average person it has become synonymous with authority. If “science” says so
then so it is and most people will consider that the end of the matter. In that
case their responsibility to make their own assessment of the situation is
relieved because someone who knows better has decided for them. It is also
interesting to see that in the mind of the average person “unscientific” means
it’s nonsense. To these people I would like to point out that deciding on the
merit of something without bothering to look into it, all based on what “authority”
has told you, makes no sense whatsoever.
Can we really trust authority if we look at who is in
control? The greatest destruction in the history of mankind has been caused by
those in power and those with knowledge. We complain and rage that it’s time
for someone else to take over but we continue to entrust ourselves to authority.
Maybe it’s time to ask ourselves what is in our best interest, and to consider
that it might be in the interest of some people to have us believe that we
cannot trust ourselves, much less other people, and that we therefore need the
protection of someone in power.
Continuing on the topic of science: it’s supposed to be
about the methodology and the reliability of the results. Yet I think that
money plays an important role: only those who have enough to be endorsed by the
right authorities can have the status. I’m not speaking against science and I
will not deny that great breakthroughs have been made. Yet knowledge is only
useful if it serves us. It is how we use knowledge that will determine whether
we heal or harm. If science makes man god over creation, as so many seem to
believe, then that is all the more reason for us to act responsibly. Although
science can provide us with some of the answers to the whats and the hows, it
can never answer the question “why” in the context of our lives. That is
something that we have to answer for ourselves. We have to own up to the
consequences of our actions following the answer. Not many are willing to do
this, which is perhaps why we are so quick to look up to authority to tell us
what we should believe and how we should live.
Returning to Big Pharma, I have decided not to judge too
quickly. The only way that any business can make a lot of money is if they
supply something that is in demand. If people want quick fixes to manage
symptoms so they can continue their lives as “normal” then who am I to say that
what pharmaceutical companies are doing is bad?
A final thought about science: as helpful as knowledge can
be, it doesn’t help much knowing anything if we don’t live better as a result.
I’ll venture to say that if we can learn to cooperate, love and live in peace
then we’ll be a thousand times better off not knowing anything even if we think
the earth is flat. Potential often lies not in what is known, because what is
known has already been created. Potential is in the vast sea of unknown
possibilities. How we act today will determine which possibility we bring into
the reality of tomorrow.