A friend of mine shared a quote in cyberspace saying that
intelligence is the best aphrodisiac. I wanted to respond, saying that I
disagreed and that to me it’s probably authenticity, sensitivity, creativity, more
or less in that order. Then I thought of blurting out that I couldn’t help
noticing when someone is easy on the eye. I realised that none of these are
entirely accurate.
I had a conversation along those lines with a friend of my
sister’s a few years ago. He asserted that women are interested in men because
of their brains. I disagreed, saying that personality comes first. He said that
that was what he referred to. I said that it wasn’t quite the same; it’s more
about someone’s vibe. I told him that I have felt attracted to a man from a
different race and background as myself during a few brief conversations I had
with him. These conversations weren’t specifically intellectually stimulating.
Just being in his presence was enough to tell me that there was something
expansive about him, which I liked. My sister’s friend said that he understood.
It wasn’t the brain per se but the demeanour, including body language and
attitude. A bit closer, yet we didn’t quite nail it.
Regardless of how hard one tries, one cannot quite capture
how the force of attraction works. When one is too clear about what one wants
in a partner and responds only to that, it usually leads to disillusionment. Attraction
happens when we recognise the sacred flame in someone else and feel it burning inside
ourselves more strongly. It is because the flame is sacred that it cannot quite
be defined or boxed in. That is why we find it mesmerising and why it has the
power to change us.
No comments:
Post a Comment